更多的氢能电厂，零碳排放
氢电厂是政府和企业以可再生能源或环保名义制造更多污染的又一骗局。如果你用谷歌搜索“氢气发电厂”，基本上前几页是关于氢气是多么美妙和清洁，很少有那些页面首先提到你从哪里获得氢气。最后我刚刚发现了这个美国能源部的说明：
https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-resources
“目前，大多数氢气是由化石燃料生产的，特别是天然气。电力——来自电网或来自风能、太阳能、地热或生物质等可再生能源——目前也用于生产氢气。从长远来看，太阳能和生物质能更直接地用于产生氢气。”
他们押注普通大众没有数学和物理的初级水平。到目前为止，他们做得很好，因为越来越多的氢能发电厂正在建设中。
顺便说一句，你是否感受到能源部关于建造永动机的暗示？
太阳能 -> 太阳能电池板 -> 电力 -> H2O 通过电解制取 H2 -> 氢气发电厂中的 H2 + O -> 电力
谁或什么可以阻止您通过电力制造氢气并再次燃烧氢气来发电？
Hydrogen power plant, another scam for creating more pollution by the name of renewable energy or environmental protection, run by governments and enterprises. If you google "Hydrogen power plant", basically the first few pages are about how wonderful and clean hydrogen is, rarely those pages mention where you get hydrogen at the first place. Finally I had just found this:
https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-resources
"Currently, most hydrogen is produced from fossil fuels, specifically natural gas. Electricity—from the grid or from renewable sources such as wind, solar, geothermal, or biomass—is also currently used to produce hydrogen. In the longer term, solar energy and biomass can be used more directly to generate hydrogen."
They are betting on that the general public does not have beginner level of math and physics. So far they are doing well, as more and more hydrogen power plants are being built.
Do you need my further analysis to understand?
BTW, do you feel the hint from Department of Energy for building a perpetual motion machine?
Solar-> Solar Panel -> Electricity -> H2 from H2O through electrolysis -> H2 + O in Hydrogen power plants -> Electricity
Who or what can stop you from making H2 through electricity and burn hydrogen for electricity again?
==================
| I think you are right. The earth has natual cold fusion cycles that people have not even understood. | |
|
| Nothing new, and it is probably a good idea after a few thousands years, since our planet earth has enough fuel for cold fusion for at least a few thousand years. One of the major purposes of CERN is to research cold fusion. | |
|
| 大少怎麽看待這個觀點？ https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/540856-solving-the-climate-and-energy-crises-mine-the-moons-helium-3/ | |
|
| 作者：体育老师 | | 留言时间：2022-05-24 09:50:33 | |
| 绿色能源的大方向永远是正确的！戈尔以此获诺奖。 但现在美国走在衰退的路上，先解决民生问题比折腾最烧钱的环保现实。 | |
|
| NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS ARE NOT APPROPRIATE FOR AUSTRALIA – AND PROBABLY NEVER WILL BE
https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/nuclear-power-stations-are-not-appropriate-for-australia-and-probably-never-will-be/
Fact, Fact, Fact, the way to hide the truth and tell lie. | |
|
| Google victoria Hydrogen power plant.
另外，澳大利亚是高质铀矿的两大来源地（另一个是加拿大）。用来发电最便宜最零碳排放。核废料可以放在方圆几千公里冇人烟的沙漠戈壁地带，干燥而地质结构稳定。但澳大利亚就是不用，而出口到中国和印度。 | |
|
| 作者：奥维尔 | | 留言时间：2022-05-23 10:50:02 | |
| 澳洲要建氢气发电厂？ 澳洲太阳能，风能一定是最丰富，哪怕不用石油，也不至需要氢气发电厂吧？ 很可能是左棍政客蠢到搞错了，误把氢气生产场当成氢气发电场了。 | |
|
| 就是在美国，95%氢由天然气CH4 裂解产生，而裂解当然需要能量。 本来烧天然气已经很低碳，却要多此一举 裂解除碳，而除碳的能量哪里来呢？ 用其它化石燃料来制氢发电就更夸张了。 基本的物理化学知识告诉我们，多一道能量形式转换就多一道损耗，根据热力学基本原理，这些损耗不可回收。 搞咁多转换，就如华尔街通过复杂的金融概念包装，把毒债包装成资产来出售。 地球被这班势力玩残，而绿党，政客和环保分子只不过这些势力的乏走狗。 | |
|
| Google victoria Hydrogen power plant. | |
|
| 是指大型发电厂.
几个礼拜前，澳大利亚维多利亚州州长豪气的宣布Hydrogen power plant,作为对全球暖化，减碳和绿色能源的回应。州长和主流媒体都只谈论电厂价格贵不贵，暗示贵也值得，为了环保。 而我认为根本问题是花大钱而剧烈增加总体污染。 显然，这不单是澳洲政客的愚蠢或邪恶，看美国能源部的说辞就知道，美帝有关势力是始作俑者或最大推手。 | |
|
| 如果氢气发电是指大型发电厂，那么就太扯了。若是指用于小型发电机（如EV), 则另当别论。 高效的能量贮存依然是难题，用电能产生氢气然后用于汽车的燃料电源，仍是一项探讨的能量贮存转换方式 |
|
沒有留言:
發佈留言